Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs GRNY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to GRNY's +6.5%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and GRNY

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
+6.5%
GRNY total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.75%
GRNY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

COWZ costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.9 points.

COWZ vs GRNY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZGRNY
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%+6.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.75%
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026$19.5bn$4.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and GRNY hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ GRNY
CF Industries Holdings Inc 0.53% 2.36%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in GRNY
Arista Networks Inc 2.92%
General Electric Co 2.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.66%
Packaging Corp of America 2.66%
PNC Financial Services Group I 2.63%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.61%
Robinhood Markets Inc 2.61%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +24.4% +6.5%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.75%
Already in the S&P 500 94.7% 98.0%
Holdings 100 43
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 $19.5bn $4.3bn

COWZ and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

GRNY

GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or GRNY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and GRNY +6.5%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or GRNY?
COWZ is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of COWZ and 98% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against GRNY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-grny

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.