Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs EMXC: how they differ
COWZ and EMXC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and EMXC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COWZ | Only in EMXC |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 18.85% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 9.26% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | SK HYNIX 7.53% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | MEDIATEK 2.12% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.20% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | DELTA ELECTRONICS 1.02% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 0.96% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | HDFC BANK 0.81% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | iShares |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +55.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | +38.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.25% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 100 | 597 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
EMXC in plain words
EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 597 positions, with the top ten at 43.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or EMXC?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and EMXC returned +55.5%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or EMXC?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and EMXC charges 0.25%, so EMXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and EMXC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 0% of EMXC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against EMXC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-emxc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources