Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
COWS vs HCOW: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, COWS returned +36.1% to HCOW's +23.9%, and COWS charges 0.19% to HCOW's 0.65%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWS and HCOWNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $46m for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF and $19m for Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF.
Pair scorecard
COWS costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.2 points; COWS is 2.4 times larger.
| Measure | COWS | HCOW |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +36.1% | +23.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 34.1% | rose 10.5% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 9.8% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index | Benchmark: Cash flow dividend leaders, measured through COWS |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $46m | $19m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 98% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 59% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.4% | |
Risk and return
Sep 29, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 161 weekly returnsFrom Sep 2023 to Oct 2026, COWS returned more: +76.4% to +40.9%. HCOW swung less: 15.0% to 17.3%. HCOW fell slightly less at its worst: −20.8% to −21.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | COWS | HCOW | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +76.4% | +40.9% | COWS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +20.1% | +11.7% | COWS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +65.8% | +3.7% | COWS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.3% | 15.0% | HCOW | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.0% | 11.1% | HCOW (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −21.5% | −20.8% | HCOW (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.89 | 0.52 | COWS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.28 | 0.70 | COWS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.94 | 0.56 | COWS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 161 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWS and HCOW hold 98% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
98% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWS and HCOW on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
COWS
COWS tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +36.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026, 59% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 32.4%.
HCOW
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HCOW paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.9%. Cash flow dividend leaders (COWS) returned +36.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.8%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
- Are COWS and HCOW in the same category?
- COWS is a stock ETF and HCOW is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, COWS or HCOW?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWS returned +36.1% and HCOW +23.9%.
- Which is cheaper, COWS or HCOW?
- COWS is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWS against HCOW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cows-vs-hcow
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). COWS against HCOW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cows-vs-hcow
[COWS against HCOW (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cows-vs-hcow)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.