Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CIBR vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CIBR returned +39.0% to SCHG's +6.8%, and SCHG charges 0.04% to CIBR's 0.58%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CIBR and SCHG
Net assets: $19.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.2 points.
| Measure | CIBR | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +39.0% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Cybersecurity | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, CIBR as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $19.0bn | $63.0bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 91% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 11% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jul 17, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 588 weekly returnsCIBR and SCHG returned about the same: +450.4% and +442.7%. SCHG swung less: 19.8% to 23.7%. CIBR and SCHG fell about the same at their worst: −33.9% and −34.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CIBR | SCHG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +450.4% | +442.7% | Tie | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.3% | +16.1% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +417.9% | +400.4% | CIBR (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 23.7% | 19.8% | SCHG | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.9% | 13.4% | SCHG | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −33.9% | −34.2% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.74 | SCHG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.99 | 1.10 | SCHG (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.48 | 0.47 | Tie | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 588 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and SCHG hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
11% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CIBR and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CIBR and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CIBR follows Cybersecurity and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 11% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CIBR returned +39.0% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 32.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CIBR
By weight, 61% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +39.0% with distributions reinvested.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are CIBR and SCHG in the same category?
- CIBR is a thematic ETF and SCHG is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, CIBR or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CIBR returned +39.0% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CIBR or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CIBR against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cibr-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CIBR against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cibr-vs-schg
[CIBR against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cibr-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.