Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to VHT's +25.0%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and VHT
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.
Pair scorecard
VHT costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.4 points; CGGR is 1.4 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +25.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $26.1bn | $19.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 51.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VHT hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
10% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and VHT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and VHT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50.
- Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and VHT +25.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 22.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VHT
VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VHT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and VHT +25.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or VHT?
- VHT is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vht
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against VHT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vht
[CGGR against VHT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-vht)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.