IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

CGGR is an actively managed equity fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SLV returned +14.9% against +2.6%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and SLV

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Silver Trust.

CGGR on its own →SLV on its own →
At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+14.9%
SLV total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.50%
SLV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGGR costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.3 points.

CGGR vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSLV
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+14.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 202653.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedSilver
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$26.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight78%
Holdings datedAug 31, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%

Method

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF SLV iShares Silver Trust
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer Capital Group iShares
What it is Actively managed Holds silver
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +14.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +15.0% (SIVR)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO −0.1 pts vs SIVR
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.50%
Holdings 96 not counted
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and SLV as of Oct 28, 2026 $25.9bn $26.9bn

CGGR and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

SLV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SLV

Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SLV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and SLV +14.9%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SLV?
CGGR is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
CGGR vs GLDMCGGR vs IAUCGGR vs GLDCGGR vs SIVRRDVY vs SLVSLV vs USMVSLV vs SPMODFUS vs SLV
Where to next
CGGR on its own →SLV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →CGGR dividend history →CGGR holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
CGGR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CGGR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Capital Group page for CGGR ↗
iShares page for SLV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against SLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-slv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.