Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs RSP: how they differ
CGGR and RSP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and RSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGGR | Only in RSP |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | Moderna Inc 0.58% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | Veeva Systems Inc 0.31% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | Valero Energy Corp 0.29% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | Charles River Laboratories International 0.28% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Phillips 66 0.28% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | Salesforce Inc 0.28% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital Group | Invesco |
| What it is | Growth | S&P 500 equal weight |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +14.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 99.1% |
| Holdings | 89 | 506 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or RSP?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and RSP returned +14.8%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or RSP?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against RSP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-rsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources