Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to ILF's +17.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and ILF

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.47%
ILF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGGR costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.6 points; CGGR is 7.4 times larger.

CGGR vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRILF
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+17.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 202613.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P Latin America 40
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$3.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%55.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR ILF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +17.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.47%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 0.0%
Holdings 96 46
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 $25.9bn $3.5bn

CGGR and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ILF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or ILF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and ILF +17.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or ILF?
CGGR is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and ILF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 0% of ILF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against ILF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-ilf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.