Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs VCIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to VCIT's −1.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and VCIT

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $66.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
−1.8%
VCIT total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.03%
VCIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCIT costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.6 points; VCIT is 1.7 times larger.

CGDV vs VCIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVVCIT
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%−1.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 20263.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$38.4bn$66.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and VCIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV VCIT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
Microsoft Corp 7.64%
NVIDIA Corp 6.32%
Broadcom Inc 4.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.55%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
Oracle Corp 3.22%
RTX Corp 3.16%
Only in VCIT
MKTLIQ 0.58%
Amazon.com Inc 0.29%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Bank of America Corp 0.27%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.26%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +15.8% −1.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) −1.8% (SCHI)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD 0.0 pts vs SCHI
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.03%
Holdings 53 2340
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and VCIT as of Sep 30, 2026 $39.1bn $66.6bn

CGDV and VCIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VCIT

VCIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.8% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or VCIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and VCIT −1.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or VCIT?
VCIT is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against VCIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vcit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.