Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDV and LYTE are measured over different days, and CGDV charges 0.33% to LYTE's 0.65%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and LYTE
Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $165m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGDV costs 0.32 points a year less; CGDV is far larger, $39.1bn against $163m.
| Measure | CGDV | LYTE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 28.5%, high on Aug 17, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Photonics and optics |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $39.1bn | $163m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Holdings dated | Aug 31, 2026 | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | |
Side by side
CGDV and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for LYTE.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
LYTE
LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it first traded on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 28.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are CGDV and LYTE in the same category?
- CGDV is a stock ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or LYTE?
- CGDV is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against LYTE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-lyte
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against LYTE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-lyte
[CGDV against LYTE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-lyte)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.