Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs FELV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to FELV's +28.8%; 19% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and FELV
Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $3.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
FELV costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.0 points; CGDV is 11.3 times larger.
| Measure | CGDV | FELV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +28.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $38.4bn | $3.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 26.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and FELV hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
19% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and FELV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and FELV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 19% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and FELV +28.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.0 points.
- Number of holdings. CGDV holds 53 positions and FELV holds 351.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FELV
FELV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +28.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 351 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or FELV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and FELV +28.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or FELV?
- FELV is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against FELV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-felv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against FELV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-felv
[CGDV against FELV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-felv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.