Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs SIVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGBL is an actively managed equity fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SIVR returned +15.0% against +7.1%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and SIVR
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.
Pair scorecard
SIVR costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points.
| Measure | CGBL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +15.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Silver |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, CGBL as of Oct 27, 2026 and SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026 | $7.9bn | $3.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 48% | |
| Holdings dated | Jun 30, 2026 | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | |
Risk and return
Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 159 weekly returnsSIVR returned more: +148.4% to +55.6%. CGBL swung less: 10.4% to 38.6%. CGBL fell less at its worst: −10.0% to −47.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGBL | SIVR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +55.6% | +148.4% | SIVR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.6% | +34.7% | SIVR | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +46.8% | +148.4% | SIVR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 10.4% | 38.6% | CGBL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 6.7% | 25.1% | CGBL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −10.0% | −47.5% | CGBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.02 | 0.85 | CGBL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.58 | 1.31 | CGBL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.55 | 0.73 | CGBL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 159 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
CGBL and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL and SIVR do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGBL follows No index, actively managed and SIVR follows Silver.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGBL returned +7.1% and SIVR +15.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.9 points.
- Cost (similar). CGBL charges 0.33% of assets a year and SIVR 0.30%, a gap of 0.03 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Its expense ratio is 0.30% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or SIVR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and SIVR +15.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or SIVR?
- SIVR is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against SIVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-sivr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against SIVR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-sivr
[CGBL against SIVR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-sivr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.