Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to QQQM's +15.2%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and QQQM
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.9bn for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
Pair scorecard
QQQM costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points; QQQM is 14.0 times larger.
| Measure | CGBL | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +15.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $7.9bn | $110.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 46.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and QQQM hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and QQQM +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-qqqm
[CGBL against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.