Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs FTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to FTEC's +25.0%; 14% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and FTEC
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
FTEC costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.9 points; FTEC is 2.9 times larger.
| Measure | CGBL | FTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +25.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 4.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $7.7bn | $22.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 62.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and FTEC hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
14% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FTEC
FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or FTEC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and FTEC +25.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or FTEC?
- FTEC is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against FTEC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-ftec
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against FTEC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-ftec
[CGBL against FTEC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-ftec)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.