Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs FLKR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to FLKR's +79.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and FLKR
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.
Pair scorecard
FLKR costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 72.6 points; CGBL is 4.6 times larger.
| Measure | CGBL | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +79.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $7.9bn | $1.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 64.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or FLKR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and FLKR +79.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or FLKR?
- FLKR is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against FLKR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-flkr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against FLKR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-flkr
[CGBL against FLKR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-flkr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.