IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BWET vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and VTWO an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +14.3%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and VTWO

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

BWET on its own →VTWO on its own →
At a glance
+5,121.7%
BWET total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
4.68%
BWET expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 4.62 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5107.4 points.

BWET vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBWETVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+5,121.7%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high11.2%, high on Oct 8, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksTanker freight futuresRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio4.68%0.06%
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$178m$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Breakwave Vanguard
What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 4.68% 0.06%
Holdings not counted 2002
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $178m $16.6bn

BWET and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BWET flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 4.62 percentage points a year. That is about $462 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
BWET vs IJTBWET vs IWMBWET vs VBBWET vs IWCUSO vs VTWOSIVR vs VTWOSLV vs VTWOGLDM vs VTWO
Where to next
BWET on its own →VTWO on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →VTWO dividend history →VTWO holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
Breakwave page for BWET ↗
VTWO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
VTWO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Vanguard page for VTWO ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.