Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SCHX?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and SCHX +13.1%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or SCHX?

SCHX is cheaper, by 4.65 percentage points a year. That is about $465 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and SCHX an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +13.1%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and SCHX

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

BWET on its own →SCHX on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+13.1%

SCHX total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.03%

SCHX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHX costs 4.65 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5108.6 points.

BWET vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	SCHX
Return
Measure	BWET	SCHX
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+13.1%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	SCHX
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	SCHX
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	SCHX
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.03%
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026	$178m	$74.2bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	SCHX
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		36.0%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Breakwave Schwab

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +13.1%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)

Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.6 pts vs IVV

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.03%

Holdings not counted 747

Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 $178m $74.2bn

BWET and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SCHX?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and SCHX +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or SCHX?: SCHX is cheaper, by 4.65 percentage points a year. That is about $465 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs ITOT BWET vs VIG BWET vs SCHB BWET vs SPYM SCHX vs USO SCHX vs SIVR SCHX vs SLV GLDM vs SCHX

Where to next

BWET on its own →SCHX on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →SCHX dividend history →SCHX holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

SCHX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SCHX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Schwab website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-schx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.