IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BWET vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and FBCG an actively managed equity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +9.5%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and FBCG

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

BWET on its own →FBCG on its own →
At a glance
+5,121.7%
BWET total return, 1 year
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
4.68%
BWET expense ratio
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FBCG costs 4.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5112.2 points.

BWET vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBWETFBCG
Return
Total return, 1 year+5,121.7%+9.5%
Drawdown
Below its high11.2%, high on Oct 8, 20265.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksTanker freight futuresNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio4.68%0.57%
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026$178m$7.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Holdings datedJul 31, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Breakwave Fidelity
What it is Holds tanker freight futures Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +9.5%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −4.2 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 4.68% 0.57%
Holdings not counted 230
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 $178m $7.6bn

BWET and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BWET flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or FBCG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and FBCG +9.5%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or FBCG?
FBCG is cheaper, by 4.11 percentage points a year. That is about $411 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
BWET vs MAGSBWET vs ONEQBWET vs GARPBWET vs XOVRFBCG vs USOFBCG vs SIVRFBCG vs SLVFBCG vs GLDM
Where to next
BWET on its own →FBCG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FBCG dividend history →FBCG holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
Breakwave page for BWET ↗
FBCG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
FBCG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Fidelity website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-fbcg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.