Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs VBK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to VBK's +10.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and VBK
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $45.4bn for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and $22.8bn for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.3 points; BSV is 2.0 times larger.
| Measure | BSV | VBK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +10.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 8.0%, high on Aug 17, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | Morningstar US Small Cap Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.05% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $45.4bn | $22.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 12.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and VBK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
VBK
VBK tracks an index of Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 554 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%. It sat 8.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VBK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and VBK +10.3%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or VBK?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against VBK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-vbk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against VBK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-vbk
[BSV against VBK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-vbk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.