Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSCW vs GIGB: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCW's duration was 5.1 years on May 31, 2026 and GIGB's 6.5 on Aug 31, 2026; GIGB charges 0.08% to BSCW's 0.10%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSCW and GIGB
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.5bn for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF and $1.0bn for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
GIGB costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; BSCW is 1.5 times larger.
| Measure | BSCW | GIGB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.3% | −1.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2032 Index | FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.5bn | $1.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 16, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 214 weekly returns · each against AGGBSCW returned more: +21.5% to +17.2%. GIGB swung slightly less: 6.5% to 6.9%. GIGB fell less at its worst: −6.7% to −7.8%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BSCW | GIGB | AGG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +21.5% | +17.2% | BSCW | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +4.9% | +3.9% | BSCW | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | −0.5% | −1.6% | BSCW | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 6.9% | 6.5% | GIGB (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 4.7% | 4.6% | GIGB (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −7.8% | −6.7% | GIGB | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 120.3% | 113.5% | 100.0% | BSCW (slight) | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 106.2% | 105.9% | 100.0% | Tie | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.16 | 1.10 | 1.00 | GIGB lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.06 | −0.08 | BSCW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 0.09 | −0.11 | BSCW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.004 | −0.004 | −0.015 | BSCW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.62 | 0.59 | BSCW (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | AGG | AGG | AGG | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +2.2% a year | +1.2% a year | 0.0% | BSCW significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 2.25 | 1.30 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | +0.3% to +4.1% | −0.6% to +3.0% | GIGB's includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 0.90 | 0.54 | BSCW | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 2.2% | 1.9% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 214 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSCW and GIGB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSCW and GIGB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSCW and GIGB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BSCW follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2032 Index and GIGB follows FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 3% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. BSCW holds 327 positions and GIGB holds 2619.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BSCW
BSCW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
GIGB
GIGB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.9% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSCW or GIGB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCW returned −1.3% and GIGB −1.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BSCW or GIGB?
- GIGB is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSCW against GIGB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscw-vs-gigb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSCW against GIGB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscw-vs-gigb
[BSCW against GIGB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscw-vs-gigb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.