Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSCV vs SLQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCV's duration was 4.4 years on May 31, 2026 and SLQD's 2.2 on Jul 31, 2026; SLQD charges 0.06% to BSCV's 0.10%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSCV and SLQDNet assets: $1.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF, and $2.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
SLQD costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points; SLQD is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | BSCV | SLQD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.6% | +1.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031 Index | Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $1.9bn | $2.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSCV and SLQD hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
7% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSCV and SLQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSCV and SLQD do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. BSCV follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031 Index and SLQD follows Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index.
- Holdings in common. 7% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BSCV returned −0.6% and SLQD +1.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BSCV
BSCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
SLQD
SLQD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.9% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSCV or SLQD?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCV returned −0.6% and SLQD +1.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BSCV or SLQD?
- SLQD is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSCV against SLQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscv-vs-slqd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSCV against SLQD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscv-vs-slqd
[BSCV against SLQD (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscv-vs-slqd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.