Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BNDX vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BNDX returned −0.9% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BNDX and MAGS

Net assets: $82.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
−0.9%
BNDX total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.07%
BNDX expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BNDX costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.7 points.

BNDX vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDXMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.9%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged)No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.30%
Net assets, BNDX as of Sep 30, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026$82.9bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BNDX MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BNDX
MKTLIQ 0.93%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.39%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.35%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.34%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.33%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.31%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Total International Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −0.9% +5.8%
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.30%
Holdings 6840 8
Net assets, BNDX as of Sep 30, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $82.9bn $5.5bn

BNDX and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BNDX

BNDX tracks an index of Total International Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.9% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or MAGS?
BNDX is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BNDX against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bndx-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.