Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and LQD returned −2.7%, so BNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BNDX or LQD?

BNDX charges 0.07% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BNDX vs LQD: how they differ

BNDX and LQD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BNDX returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BNDX	Only in LQD
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.18%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%
Bundesschatzanweisungen 0.14%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
Canadian Government Bond 0.13%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
Canadian Government Bond 0.09%	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

BNDX and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Total International Bond	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.07%	0.14%
Holdings	6707	3149

BNDX in plain words

BNDX is a bond fund tracking the Total International Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and LQD returned −2.7%, so BNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or LQD?: BNDX charges 0.07% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BNDX against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BNDX against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bndx-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources