Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to SPMO's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and SPMO

Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $22.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.7 points.

BND vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 202010.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.13%
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026$161.4bn$22.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 574 weekly returns
BND SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +19.5% +519.8%
Annualized edge SPMO +1.6% +18.0%
Price return edge SPMO −13.2% +442.9%
Risk
Volatility edge BND 5.0% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge BND −18.4% −28.3%
Downside capture 95.6% 93.8%
Beta 0.91 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO −0.11 0.84
Sortino edge SPMO −0.16 1.27
Treynor 0.016 0.164
Calmar edge SPMO 0.09 0.63
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.2% a year +3.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.59 1.28
Information ratio 0.03 0.36
Tracking error 1.3% 9.7%

Each against its own benchmark: BND against AGG, Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPMO returned more: +519.8% to +19.5%. BND swung less: 5.0% to 19.0%. BND fell less at its worst: −18.4% to −28.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BND vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+19.5%+519.8%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.6%+18.0%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−13.2%+442.9%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.0%19.0%BNDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.7%12.6%BNDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.4%−28.3%BNDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture95.8%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.6%93.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.910.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.940.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.110.84SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.161.27SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0160.164Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.090.63SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.2% a year+3.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.591.28Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.7%−2.0% to +9.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.030.36Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.3%9.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 574 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BND and SPMO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BND SPMO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BND
MKTLIQ 0.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.39%
Only in SPMO
Apple Inc 9.95%
Micron Technology Inc 8.80%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.48%
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Intel Corp 4.60%
Alphabet Inc 3.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.13%
Holdings 16301 101
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026 $161.4bn $22.3bn

BND and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-3EA9D22F8D

BND and SPMO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. BND follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index and SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BND returned −1.3% and SPMO +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 19.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, BND or SPMO?
BND is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.