Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs LSEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BND returned +0.2% to LSEQ's +26.5%, and BND charges 0.03% to LSEQ's 2.28%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and LSEQ

Net assets: $167.4bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $17m on Nov 3, 2026 for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF.

At a glance
+0.2%
BND total return, 1 year
+26.5%
LSEQ total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
2.28%
LSEQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 2.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.3 points.

BND vs LSEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDLSEQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+26.5%
Total return, 52 weeks+24.5%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash20.8 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%2.28%
Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and LSEQ as of Nov 3, 2026$167.4bn$17m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.18
Beta to the S&P 500+0.24: about 0.24% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.27%
Down-week capture24.8%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Long-short equity
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +26.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 2.28%
Holdings 16300 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and LSEQ as of Nov 3, 2026 $167.4bn $17m

BND and LSEQ on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

LSEQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

LSEQ

LSEQ is a long-short equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.18 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.24, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.24% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks LSEQ fell 0.27% on average, a down-week capture of 24.8%. Over the same 52 weeks LSEQ returned +24.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 20.8 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are BND and LSEQ in the same category?
BND is a bond ETF and LSEQ is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, BND or LSEQ?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +0.2% and LSEQ +26.5%.
Which is cheaper, BND or LSEQ?
BND is cheaper, by 2.25 percentage points a year. That is about $225 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against LSEQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-lseq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.