Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BITO vs ITOT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BITO returned −30.5% to ITOT's +13.4%, and ITOT charges 0.03% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BITO and ITOT
Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares Bitcoin ETF, and $97.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.
Pair scorecard
ITOT costs 0.92 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 43.9 points; ITOT is far larger, $97.1bn against $1.6bn.
| Measure | BITO | ITOT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −30.5% | +13.4% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin | S&P Total Market Index (TMI) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.6bn | $97.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and ITOT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BITO and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITO and ITOT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. BITO follows Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin and ITOT follows S&P Total Market Index (TMI).
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BITO returned −30.5% and ITOT +13.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 43.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
ITOT
ITOT tracks the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,443 positions, with the top ten at 33.9%.
Questions people ask
- Are BITO and ITOT in the same category?
- BITO is a crypto futures ETF and ITOT is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or ITOT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −30.5% and ITOT +13.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or ITOT?
- ITOT is cheaper, by 0.92 percentage points a year. That is about $92 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BITO against ITOT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-itot
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BITO against ITOT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-itot
[BITO against ITOT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-itot)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.