Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BITO vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BITO returned −30.5% to ILF's +17.2%, and ILF charges 0.47% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BITO and ILF
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $1.6bn for ProShares Bitcoin ETF and $3.5bn for iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
Pair scorecard
ILF costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 47.7 points; ILF is 2.2 times larger.
| Measure | BITO | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −30.5% | +17.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin | S&P Latin America 40 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.47% |
| Net assets | $1.6bn | $3.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 55.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BITO and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITO and ILF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. BITO follows Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin and ILF follows S&P Latin America 40.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BITO returned −30.5% and ILF +17.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 47.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are BITO and ILF in the same category?
- BITO is a crypto futures ETF and ILF is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or ILF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −30.5% and ILF +17.2%.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or ILF?
- ILF is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. That is about $48 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BITO against ILF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-ilf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BITO against ILF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-ilf
[BITO against ILF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-ilf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.