Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs USMV: how they differ
BINC and USMV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and USMV returned more over the year.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and USMV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BINC | Only in USMV |
|---|---|
| UMBS, TBA 5.13% | AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 1.58% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.81% | MICROSOFT 1.56% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.14% | NVIDIA 1.54% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.10% | WELLTOWER 1.53% |
| UMBS, TBA 1.52% | CHUBB 1.49% |
| iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.49% |
| iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 1.49% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.53% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Flexible Income | MSCI USA Min Vol Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | +6.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | −10.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 2.4% | 94.8% |
| Holdings | 4124 | 175 |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
USMV in plain words
USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 175 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or USMV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and USMV returned +6.6%, so USMV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do BINC and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 2% of BINC and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against USMV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-usmv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources