Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BINC vs EEM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to EEM's +16.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BINC and EEMNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $16.8bn for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and $29.1bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
Pair scorecard
BINC costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.8 points; EEM is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | BINC | EEM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +16.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI Emerging Markets Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.72% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.8bn | $29.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.6% | 37.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BINC and EEM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
EEM
EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or EEM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and EEM +16.3%.
- Which is cheaper, BINC or EEM?
- BINC is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BINC against EEM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-eem
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BINC against EEM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-eem
[BINC against EEM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-eem)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.