Which returned more over the last year, BIL or BND?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and BND returned −0.7%, so BIL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BIL or BND?

BIL charges 0.14% a year and BND charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BIL vs BND: how they differ

BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and BND a bond index fund, and over the year BIL returned more, +3.7% against −0.7%.

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund.

BIL and BND on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	State Street	Vanguard
What it is	1-3 month T-bills	US aggregate bonds
Total return, 1 year	+3.7%	−0.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.8 pts	−18.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.03%

BIL in plain words

BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or BND?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and BND returned −0.7%, so BIL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BIL or BND?: BIL charges 0.14% a year and BND charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIL against BND, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against BND, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-bnd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources