Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BBMC vs FFSM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BBMC returned +17.6% to FFSM's +14.5%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BBMC and FFSM
Net assets: $2.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF, and $1.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
BBMC costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points.
| Measure | BBMC | FFSM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +14.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 11.3%, high on Aug 17, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morning- star US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.43% |
| Net assets, BBMC as of Oct 28, 2026 and FFSM as of Sep 30, 2026 | $2.1bn | $1.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 8.1% | 14.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 12, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 297 weekly returnsFFSM returned more: +62.1% to +49.3%. BBMC and FFSM swung about the same: 18.8% and 18.8%. FFSM fell less at its worst: −26.3% to −29.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BBMC | FFSM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +49.3% | +62.1% | FFSM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.3% | +8.8% | FFSM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +38.9% | +57.0% | FFSM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.8% | 18.8% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.0% | 12.9% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −29.2% | −26.3% | FFSM | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.28 | 0.36 | FFSM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.41 | 0.52 | FFSM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.25 | 0.34 | FFSM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 297 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BBMC and FFSM hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
15% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BBMC and FFSM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BBMC and FFSM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BBMC follows Morning- star US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index and FFSM follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BBMC returned +17.6% and FFSM +14.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BBMC
BBMC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 21% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 459 positions, with the top ten at 8.1%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FFSM
FFSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.43% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 9% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 14.0%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BBMC or FFSM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BBMC returned +17.6% and FFSM +14.5%.
- Which is cheaper, BBMC or FFSM?
- BBMC is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BBMC against FFSM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbmc-vs-ffsm
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BBMC against FFSM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbmc-vs-ffsm
[BBMC against FFSM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbmc-vs-ffsm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.