Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AVUS vs BITO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AVUS returned +18.0% to BITO's −30.5%, and AVUS charges 0.15% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AVUS and BITO
Net assets: $14.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF, and $1.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares Bitcoin ETF.
Pair scorecard
AVUS costs 0.80 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 48.5 points; AVUS is 9.3 times larger.
| Measure | AVUS | BITO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | −30.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.95% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $14.8bn | $1.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 84% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 30.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and BITO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AVUS and BITO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS and BITO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. AVUS follows No index, actively managed and BITO follows Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AVUS returned +18.0% and BITO −30.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 48.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000.
AVUS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,943 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
Questions people ask
- Are AVUS and BITO in the same category?
- AVUS is a stock ETF and BITO is a crypto futures ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or BITO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +18.0% and BITO −30.5%.
- Which is cheaper, AVUS or BITO?
- AVUS is cheaper, by 0.80 percentage points a year. That is about $80 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AVUS against BITO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avus-vs-bito
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AVUS against BITO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avus-vs-bito
[AVUS against BITO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avus-vs-bito)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.