Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AVLV vs KLMN: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AVLV returned +29.6% to KLMN's +13.6%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AVLV and KLMN
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $22.4bn for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and $2.5bn for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF.
Pair scorecard
KLMN costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.0 points; AVLV is 9.0 times larger.
| Measure | AVLV | KLMN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +29.6% | +13.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $22.4bn | $2.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 28% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.8% | 35.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and KLMN hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
28% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AVLV and KLMN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV and KLMN do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. AVLV follows No index, actively managed and KLMN follows MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index.
- Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AVLV returned +29.6% and KLMN +13.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.0 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value.
AVLV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 298 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
KLMN
KLMN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 273 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or KLMN?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +29.6% and KLMN +13.6%.
- Which is cheaper, AVLV or KLMN?
- KLMN is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AVLV against KLMN, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-klmn
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AVLV against KLMN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-klmn
[AVLV against KLMN (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-klmn)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.