Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AVDV vs IJH: how they differ
AVDV and IJH hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVDV returned more over the year.
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AVDV and IJH hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AVDV | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| First Resources Ltd | 0.16% | 0.23% |
| Helia Group Ltd | 0.16% | 0.21% |
| Billerud Aktiebolag | 0.14% | 0.12% |
| Paragon Banking Group PLC | 0.20% | 0.11% |
| Oesterreichische Post AG | 0.12% | 0.09% |
| Orora Ltd | 0.09% | 0.17% |
| FLSmidth & Co A/S | 0.07% | 0.27% |
| AMG Critical Materials NV | 0.06% | 0.27% |
| 4imprint Group PLC | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| Neuren Pharmaceuticals Ltd | 0.03% | 0.19% |
| Austal Ltd | 0.02% | 0.14% |
| McMillan Shakespeare Ltd | 0.02% | 0.09% |
| Only in AVDV | Only in IJH |
|---|---|
| AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik 1.72% | TWILIO CLASS A 1.00% |
| Mitsui Kinzoku Co Ltd 1.38% | ILLUMINA INC 0.87% |
| Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd 0.74% | TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc 0.67% | EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85% |
| OceanaGold Corp 0.63% | OKTA CLASS A 0.82% |
| Perseus Mining Ltd 0.63% | ATI 0.78% |
| Coeur Mining Inc 0.61% | NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72% |
| Whitehaven Coal Ltd 0.61% | TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Avantis | iShares |
| What it is | International Small Cap Value | S&P MidCap 400 |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.0% | +13.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.5 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1751 | 405 |
AVDV in plain words
AVDV is an index equity fund tracking the International Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1751 positions, with the top ten at 8.2%.
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVDV or IJH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVDV returned +31.0% and IJH returned +13.4%, so AVDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AVDV or IJH?
- AVDV charges 0.36% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AVDV and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVDV and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVDV against IJH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avdv-vs-ijh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources