Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
APCB vs BSCV: Differences, Returns & Fees
APCB's duration was 4.1 years on Aug 31, 2026 and BSCV's 4.4 on May 31, 2026; BSCV charges 0.10% to APCB's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about APCB and BSCVNet assets: $1.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSCV costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points.
| Measure | APCB | BSCV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | −0.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, APCB as of Aug 31, 2026 and BSCV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.0bn | $1.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, APCB and BSCV hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
APCB and BSCV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APCB and BSCV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. APCB follows No index, actively managed and BSCV follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031 Index.
- Holdings in common. 1% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. APCB holds 1,890 positions and BSCV holds 493.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
APCB
APCB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Total Return Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
BSCV
BSCV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, APCB or BSCV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, APCB returned −1.4% and BSCV −0.6%.
- Which is cheaper, APCB or BSCV?
- BSCV is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, APCB against BSCV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/apcb-vs-bscv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). APCB against BSCV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/apcb-vs-bscv
[APCB against BSCV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/apcb-vs-bscv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.