Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AOR vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to XLB's +18.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOR and XLB

Net assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $8.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
AOR total return, 1 year
+18.5%
XLB total return, 1 year
0.15%
AOR expense ratio
0.08%
XLB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLB costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.7 points; XLB is 2.1 times larger.

AOR vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAORXLB
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%+18.5%
Benchmark
What it tracks60/40 Balanced AllocationMaterials Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.9bn$8.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%58.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and XLB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOR XLB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AOR
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 35.70%
ISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF 32.15%
ISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF 17.10%
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS 6.34%
iShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET 5.81%
ISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF 1.89%
ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF 0.92%
Only in XLB
LINDE PLC 12.96%
NEWMONT CORP 6.56%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 5.23%
ECOLAB INC 4.98%
VULCAN MATERIALS CO 4.89%
NUCOR CORP 4.89%
AIR PRODUCTS + CHEMICALS INC 4.84%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC 4.77%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation Tracks an index of Materials
Total return, 1 year +7.8% +18.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −5.6 pts vs ACWI not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.8%
Holdings 7 25
Net assets, AOR as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLB as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.9bn $8.1bn

AOR and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AOR and XLB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AOR

AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

XLB

XLB tracks an index of Materials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or XLB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and XLB +18.5%.
Which is cheaper, AOR or XLB?
XLB is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AOR and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOR against XLB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-xlb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.