Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AOR vs BINC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to BINC's +0.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOR and BINCNet assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $16.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF.
Pair scorecard
AOR costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points; BINC is 4.3 times larger.
| Measure | AOR | BINC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | +0.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | 60/40 Balanced Allocation | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.9bn | $16.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 99.9% | 24.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and BINC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AOR and BINC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR
AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or BINC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and BINC +0.5%.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or BINC?
- AOR is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOR against BINC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-binc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AOR against BINC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-binc
[AOR against BINC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-binc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.