Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWX vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWX returned +14.3% to VGIT's −1.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWX and VGIT
Net assets: $17.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF, and $39.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.
Pair scorecard
VGIT costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.8 points; VGIT is 2.3 times larger.
| Measure | ACWX | VGIT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% | −1.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $17.3bn | $39.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 15.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 4, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 881 weekly returnsACWX returned more: +178.4% to +41.4%. VGIT swung less: 4.2% to 17.0%. VGIT fell less at its worst: −15.6% to −34.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ACWX | VGIT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +178.4% | +41.4% | ACWX | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +6.2% | +2.1% | ACWX | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +76.7% | −4.2% | ACWX | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.0% | 4.2% | VGIT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.1% | 2.9% | VGIT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −34.2% | −15.6% | VGIT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.35 | 0.15 | ACWX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.49 | 0.21 | ACWX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.18 | 0.13 | ACWX | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 881 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWX and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX and VGIT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ACWX follows MSCI ACWI ex USA Index and VGIT follows Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ACWX returned +14.3% and VGIT −1.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 15.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ACWX
ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,939 positions, with the top ten at 15.6%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VGIT
VGIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.5% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or VGIT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +14.3% and VGIT −1.5%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or VGIT?
- VGIT is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWX against VGIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-vgit
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWX against VGIT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-vgit
[ACWX against VGIT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-vgit)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.