Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWX vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWX returned +14.3% to SCHX's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWX and SCHXNet assets: $17.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHX costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points.
| Measure | ACWX | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, ACWX as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 | $17.9bn | $74.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 15.6% | 36.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 884 weekly returnsSCHX returned more: +831.5% to +180.3%. SCHX swung slightly less: 16.2% to 17.0%. SCHX fell slightly less at its worst: −32.3% to −34.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ACWX | SCHX | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +180.3% | +831.5% | SCHX | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +6.3% | +14.0% | SCHX | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +77.9% | +597.2% | SCHX | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.0% | 16.2% | SCHX (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.1% | 11.2% | SCHX (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −34.2% | −32.3% | SCHX (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.35 | 0.80 | SCHX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.49 | 1.16 | SCHX | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.18 | 0.43 | SCHX | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 884 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and SCHX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWX and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX and SCHX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ACWX follows MSCI ACWI ex USA Index and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- Cost. ACWX charges 0.32% of assets a year and SCHX 0.03%, a gap of 0.29 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ACWX
ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,939 positions, with the top ten at 15.6%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHX
SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or SCHX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +14.3% and SCHX +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or SCHX?
- SCHX is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWX against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-schx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWX against SCHX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-schx
[ACWX against SCHX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-schx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.