Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWX vs JAAA: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWX returned +14.3% to JAAA's +4.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWX and JAAA
Net assets: $17.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF, and $32.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF.
Pair scorecard
JAAA costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points; JAAA is 1.8 times larger.
| Measure | ACWX | JAAA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% | +4.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $17.9bn | $32.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 15.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and JAAA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWX and JAAA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX
ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,939 positions, with the top ten at 15.6%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
JAAA
JAAA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or JAAA?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +14.3% and JAAA +4.7%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or JAAA?
- JAAA is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWX against JAAA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-jaaa
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWX against JAAA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-jaaa
[ACWX against JAAA (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-jaaa)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.