Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or BNDX?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and BNDX returned −0.7%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or BNDX?

ACWX charges 0.32% a year and BNDX charges 0.07%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs BNDX: how they differ

ACWX and BNDX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and BNDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWX	Only in BNDX
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09%	French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.18%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50%	Bundesschatzanweisungen 0.14%
SK HYNIX 2.04%	Canadian Government Bond 0.13%
ASML HOLDING 1.77%	Canadian Government Bond 0.10%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94%	Canadian Government Bond 0.10%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88%	Canadian Government Bond 0.09%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79%	Canadian Government Bond 0.08%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76%	Canadian Government Bond 0.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

ACWX and BNDX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	MSCI ACWI ex U.S.	Total International Bond
Total return, 1 year	+23.0%	−0.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.5 pts	−18.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.07%
Holdings	1515	6707

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.

BNDX in plain words

BNDX is a bond fund tracking the Total International Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or BNDX?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and BNDX returned −0.7%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or BNDX?: ACWX charges 0.32% a year and BNDX charges 0.07%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against BNDX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against BNDX, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-bndx Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources