Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWI vs IJT: how they differ
ACWI and IJT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IJT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWI | IJT |
|---|---|---|
| AIRBUS GROUP | 0.13% | 0.58% |
| LVMH | 0.11% | 0.26% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.10% | 0.76% |
| CREDIT AGRICOLE SA | 0.02% | 0.54% |
| CONTINENTAL AG | 0.01% | 0.24% |
| FINECOBANK BANCA FINECO | 0.01% | 0.12% |
| Only in ACWI | Only in IJT |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 4.89% | CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS 1.29% |
| APPLE 4.67% | VIASAT INC 1.19% |
| MICROSOFT 3.38% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 2.38% | PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90% | FORMFACTOR INC 1.03% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86% | RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98% |
| BROADCOM INC 1.59% | ALKERMES 0.91% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50% | STONEX GROUP INC 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.1% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.6 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 61.4% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1630 | 355 |
ACWI in plain words
ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IJT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and IJT returned +17.6%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or IJT?
- ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IJT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWI and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against IJT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-ijt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources