Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs AVDV: how they differ

ACWI and AVDV hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVDV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and AVDV hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and AVDV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIAVDV
WALT DISNEY0.18%0.10%
AIRBUS GROUP0.13%0.08%
WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY SERIES A0.06%0.17%
HERMES INTERNATIONAL0.05%0.33%
NEC0.04%0.05%
REPUBLIC SERVICES INC0.04%0.34%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES0.10%0.04%
ORANGE SA0.03%0.09%
PRUDENTIAL PLC0.03%0.63%
CARNIVAL CORP LTD0.03%0.01%
ASR NEDERLAND0.01%0.05%
BANKINTER SA0.01%0.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in AVDV
NVIDIA 4.89%AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik 1.72%
APPLE 4.67%Mitsui Kinzoku Co Ltd 1.38%
MICROSOFT 3.38%Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd 0.74%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.38%Hudbay Minerals Inc 0.67%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90%OceanaGold Corp 0.63%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86%Coeur Mining Inc 0.61%
BROADCOM INC 1.59%Whitehaven Coal Ltd 0.61%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50%B2Gold Corp 0.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

ACWI and AVDV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesAvantis
What it isMSCI ACWIInternational Small Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+31.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+13.5 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.36%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%0.0%
Holdings16301751

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

AVDV in plain words

AVDV is an index equity fund tracking the International Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1751 positions, with the top ten at 8.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or AVDV?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and AVDV returned +31.0%, so AVDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or AVDV?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and AVDV charges 0.36%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and AVDV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of AVDV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against AVDV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against AVDV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-avdv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources