Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
HELO vs HEQT: Correlation to the S&P 500
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HELO moved less with the S&P 500 than HEQT: correlation +0.95 against +0.97.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HELO and HEQT
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $4.9bn for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF and $307m for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF.
HELO in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HELO −0.65%.
HEQT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, HEQT −0.58%.
Pair scorecard
HEQT costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; HELO is 16.0 times larger.
| Measure | HELO | HEQT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +10.3% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.48% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $4.9bn | $307m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.59: about 0.59% for each 1% | +0.56: about 0.56% for each 1% |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.65% | fell 0.58% |
How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 22 equity hedged alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 160 weekly returns · each against VOOFrom Oct 2023 to Oct 2026, HEQT returned more: +50.0% to +40.4%. HELO and HEQT swung about the same: 7.8% and 7.7%. HEQT fell slightly less at its worst: −9.3% to −9.6%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | HELO | HEQT | VOO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +40.4% | +50.0% | HEQT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +11.6% | +14.1% | HEQT | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +37.7% | +40.4% | HEQT (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 7.8% | 7.7% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 5.0% | 4.8% | HEQT (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −9.6% | −9.3% | HEQT (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 44.7% | 46.7% | 100.0% | HEQT (slight) | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 62.7% | 58.8% | 100.0% | HEQT (slight) | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.53 | 0.52 | 1.00 | Tie | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.90 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.88 | 1.17 | HEQT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.37 | 1.87 | HEQT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.130 | 0.174 | 0.162 | HEQT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 1.22 | 1.52 | HEQT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | VOO | VOO | VOO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −1.7% a year | +0.6% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.32 | 0.45 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −4.2% to +0.8% | −2.1% to +3.4% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −1.33 | −0.99 | HEQT | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 7.0% | 7.2% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 160 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | HELO | HEQT | HELO | HEQT |
| 3 months | +0.2% | +0.8% | +0.3 pts vs VOO | +0.9 pts vs VOO |
| 6 months | +3.1% | +4.8% | −1.9 pts vs VOO | −0.2 pts vs VOO |
| 1 year | +7.2% | +10.3% | −7.6 pts vs VOO | −4.5 pts vs VOO |
| 3 years | +40.1% | +50.4% | −43.2 pts vs VOO | −32.9 pts vs VOO |
| Since launchNot the same days: HELO Sep 2023 · HEQT Nov 2021 | +42.5% | +54.7% | −43.9 pts vs VOO | −23.3 pts vs VOO |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
One strategy, two funds
HELO and HEQT both run a hedged equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, HELO’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.95 with the S&P 500 and HEQT’s +0.97. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, HELO averaged −0.65% and HEQT −0.58%. Over the same weeks, HELO finished 3.4 percentage points ahead of cash and HEQT finished 6.5 points ahead of cash.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
HELO
HELO is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.95 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.59, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.59% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks HELO fell 0.65% on average, a down-week capture of 60.7%. Over the same 52 weeks HELO returned +7.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 3.4 percentage points ahead of cash.
HEQT
HEQT is a hedged equity fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.97 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.56, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.56% the same way. In the same weeks HEQT fell 0.58% on average, a down-week capture of 54.2%. Over the same 52 weeks HEQT returned +10.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.5 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Which moved less with the S&P 500, HELO or HEQT?
- Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, HELO’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.95 with the S&P 500 and HEQT’s +0.97, so HELO moved less with the index.
- Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, HELO or HEQT?
- In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, HELO averaged −0.65% and HEQT −0.58%, so HEQT returned more in those weeks.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HELO against HEQT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/helo-vs-heqt
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). HELO against HEQT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/helo-vs-heqt
[HELO against HEQT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/helo-vs-heqt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.