Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DBMF vs FFUT: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FFUT moved less with the S&P 500 than DBMF: correlation −0.04 against +0.26.

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF.

+0.26DBMF correlation with the S&P 500
−0.04FFUT correlation with the S&P 500
−16.8%DBMF down-week capture
−32.3%FFUT down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: FFUT scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

DBMF 78.5FFUT 90.54.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DBMFRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%DBMF+0.21%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%DBMF+0.21%Average week when SPY fell
FFUTRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%FFUT+0.40%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%FFUT+0.40%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

DBMF and FFUT both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, DBMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500 and FFUT’s −0.04. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, DBMF averaged +0.21% and FFUT +0.40%. Over the same weeks, DBMF finished 21.7 percentage points ahead of cash and FFUT finished 23.4 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

DBMF and FFUT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
DBMFFFUTDBMFFFUT
3 months+4.8%+10.7%+2.5 pts+8.4 pts
6 months+9.1%+13.8%−8.9 pts−4.3 pts
1 year+25.4%+26.7%+8.8 pts+10.2 pts
3 years+32.1%not published−46.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+96.5%+31.6%−99.2 pts+1.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DBMF and FFUT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssueriMGPFidelity
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.26−0.04
Beta to the S&P 500+0.20−0.03
Down-week capture−16.8%−32.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.21%+0.40%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+25.4%+27.0%
Against T-bills, percentage points+21.7 pts+23.4 pts
Expense ratio0.85%0.80%
ListedMay 8, 2019Jun 5, 2025
Net assets$3.9bn$352m

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.20, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.20% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks DBMF rose 0.21% on average, a down-week capture of −16.8%. Over the same 52 weeks DBMF returned +25.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 21.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

FFUT in plain words

FFUT is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.04 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.03, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.03% the other way. In the same weeks FFUT rose 0.40% on average, a down-week capture of −32.3%. Over the same 52 weeks FFUT returned +27.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 23.4 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, DBMF or FFUT?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, DBMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.26 with the S&P 500 and FFUT’s −0.04, so FFUT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, DBMF or FFUT?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, DBMF averaged +0.21% and FFUT +0.40%, so FFUT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, DBMF or FFUT?
Over the same weeks, DBMF finished 21.7 percentage points ahead of cash and FFUT finished 23.4 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, DBMF or FFUT?
DBMF charges 0.85% a year and FFUT charges 0.80%, so FFUT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DBMF against FFUT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DBMF against FFUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/dbmf-vs-ffut Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources