Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

CCOR vs ZHDG: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CCOR moved less with the S&P 500 than ZHDG: correlation −0.14 against +0.96.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CCOR and ZHDG

Net assets on Jul 31, 2026: $28m for Core Alternative ETF and $35m for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF.

At a glance
−0.14
CCOR correlation with the S&P 500
+0.96
ZHDG correlation with the S&P 500
−20.7%
CCOR down-week capture
85.6%
ZHDG down-week capture
CCOR Rose when the S&P 500 fell
Rose when the S&P 500 fellCCOR in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CCOR +0.22%.SPY−1.07%CCOR+0.22%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Rose when the S&P 500 fellCCOR in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CCOR +0.22%.SPY−1.07%CCOR+0.22%Average week when SPY fell

CCOR in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, CCOR +0.22%.

ZHDG Fell 86% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 86% as much as the S&P 500ZHDG in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, ZHDG −0.92%.SPY−1.07%ZHDG−0.92%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 86% as much as the S&P 500ZHDG in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, ZHDG −0.92%.SPY−1.07%ZHDG−0.92%Average week when SPY fell

ZHDG in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, ZHDG −0.92%.

Pair scorecard

ZHDG costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; ZHDG is 1.3 times larger.

CCOR vs ZHDG: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureCCORZHDG
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.6%+6.6%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.16%0.95%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$28m$35m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500−0.10: about 0.10% for each 1%+0.82: about 0.82% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 0.22%fell 0.92%
ETFIQ Stock Diversification Score · CCOR scores higher How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?
IQ Alternatives Score90.9CCOR25ZHDG

How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 22 equity hedged alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed

4.5, the lowest in this set 95.5, the highest

One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CCOR vs ZHDG: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total return
WindowCCORZHDG
3 months+3.3%−1.4%
6 months+6.0%+3.0%
1 year+7.6%+6.6%
3 years0.0%+49.1%
Since launchNot the same days: CCOR May 2017 · ZHDG Jul 2021+21.2%+33.8%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CCOR Core Alternative ETF · Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF · Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options
Issuer Core Alternative Zega
Strategy Hedged equity Hedged equity
Correlation with the S&P 500 −0.14 +0.96
Beta to the S&P 500 −0.10 +0.82
Down-week capture −20.7% 85.6%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell +0.22% −0.92%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +7.5% +6.3%
Against T-bills, percentage points +3.9 pts +2.6 pts
Expense ratio 1.16% 0.95%
First traded May 24, 2017 Jul 7, 2021
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 $28m $35m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

CCOR and ZHDG both run a hedged equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, CCOR’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.14 with the S&P 500 and ZHDG’s +0.96. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, CCOR averaged +0.22% and ZHDG −0.92%. Over the same weeks, CCOR finished 3.9 percentage points ahead of cash and ZHDG finished 2.6 points ahead of cash.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CCOR

CCOR is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.14 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.10, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.10% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks CCOR rose 0.22% on average, a down-week capture of −20.7%. Over the same 52 weeks CCOR returned +7.5% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 3.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

ZHDG

ZHDG is a hedged equity fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.96 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.82, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.82% the same way. In the same weeks ZHDG fell 0.92% on average, a down-week capture of 85.6%. Over the same 52 weeks ZHDG returned +6.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 2.6 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CCOR or ZHDG?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, CCOR’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.14 with the S&P 500 and ZHDG’s +0.96, so CCOR moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CCOR or ZHDG?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, CCOR averaged +0.22% and ZHDG −0.92%, so CCOR returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CCOR or ZHDG?
Over the same weeks, CCOR finished 3.9 percentage points ahead of cash and ZHDG finished 2.6 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CCOR or ZHDG?
CCOR charges 1.16% a year and ZHDG charges 0.95%, so ZHDG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CCOR against ZHDG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/ccor-vs-zhdg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.