Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ASGM vs HFGM: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, HFGM moved less with the S&P 500 than ASGM: correlation +0.57 against +0.81.

Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF and Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF.

+0.81ASGM correlation with the S&P 500
+0.57HFGM correlation with the S&P 500
64.2%ASGM down-week capture
73.9%HFGM down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: HFGM scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

ASGM 29.4HFGM 32.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ASGMFell 64% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%ASGM−0.80%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%ASGM−0.80%Average week when SPY fell
HFGMFell 74% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%HFGM−0.92%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%HFGM−0.92%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

ASGM and HFGM both run a global macro strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, ASGM’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.81 with the S&P 500 and HFGM’s +0.57. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, ASGM averaged −0.80% and HFGM −0.92%. Over the same weeks, ASGM finished 24.6 percentage points ahead of cash and HFGM finished 9.1 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

ASGM and HFGM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
ASGMHFGMASGMHFGM
3 months+1.1%+0.9%−1.1 pts−1.3 pts
6 months+17.7%+1.3%−0.4 pts−16.7 pts
1 year+28.4%+12.8%+11.8 pts−3.8 pts
Since launch+36.9%+40.4%+13.9 pts−3.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ASGM and HFGM on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ASGM
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF
Global macro fund: takes positions across countries, currencies, interest rates and commodities on a view of the economy
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
Global macro fund: takes positions across countries, currencies, interest rates and commodities on a view of the economy
IssuerVirtusUnlimited
StrategyGlobal macroGlobal macro
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.81+0.57
Beta to the S&P 500+0.86+0.89
Down-week capture64.2%73.9%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.80%−0.92%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+28.3%+12.7%
Against T-bills, percentage points+24.6 pts+9.1 pts
Expense ratio0.86%1.01%
ListedAug 5, 2025Apr 15, 2025
Net assets$8m$155m

ASGM in plain words

ASGM is a global macro fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.81 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.86, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.86% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks ASGM fell 0.80% on average, a down-week capture of 64.2%. Over the same 52 weeks ASGM returned +28.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 24.6 percentage points ahead of cash.

HFGM in plain words

HFGM is a global macro fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.57 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.89, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.89% the same way. In the same weeks HFGM fell 0.92% on average, a down-week capture of 73.9%. Over the same 52 weeks HFGM returned +12.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 9.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, ASGM or HFGM?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, ASGM’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.81 with the S&P 500 and HFGM’s +0.57, so HFGM moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, ASGM or HFGM?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, ASGM averaged −0.80% and HFGM −0.92%, so ASGM returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, ASGM or HFGM?
Over the same weeks, ASGM finished 24.6 percentage points ahead of cash and HFGM finished 9.1 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, ASGM or HFGM?
ASGM charges 0.86% a year and HFGM charges 1.01%, so ASGM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ASGM against HFGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ASGM against HFGM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/asgm-vs-hfgm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources