SK vs SKHN: Leverage, Returns & Decay

Over a month against its daily multiple, compounded, SK finished 0.5 points short and SKHN 0.1 points short. Net assets on Oct 21, 2026: $18m for Corgi SK hynix 2x Daily ETF and $728,651 for Tradr 2X Short SK Hynix Daily ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about SK and SKHN

Answers cite the figures on this page.

SK costs 0.99 points a year less; SK is far larger, $18m against $728,651.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SK vs SKHN: Leverage, Returns & Decay
SKSKHN
Expense ratio0.50%1.49%
Net assets$18m$728,651
What it tracksSK hynix Inc. (from its own objective)SK Hynix
Holdings in commonnot published
What its daily multiple gave−35.3% (3 months)59.1% (1 month)
Against its daily multiple2.6 points short (3 months)0.1 points short (1 month)
−37.9%
SK returned, 3 months
−45.5%
SKHN returned, since launch, Jul 28, 2026
−11.3 pts
SK from its stated multiple: compounding −8.7 pts, gap to the daily multiple −2.6 pts
−25.3 pts
SKHN from its stated multiple: compounding −25.3 pts, gap to the daily multiple 0.0 pts

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

SK · 3 months to Oct 21, 202611.3 pts short of its stated multiple
11.3 pts short of its stated multipleSK returned −37.9% while 2 times SKHY's move would have been −26.6%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.SKHY −13.3% ×2 implies−26.6%SK returned−37.9%11.3 pts short of its stated multipleSK returned −37.9% while 2 times SKHY's move would have been −26.6%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.SKHY −13.3% ×2 implies−26.6%SK returned−37.9%

SK returned −37.9% while 2 times SKHY's move would have been −26.6%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.

SK returned −37.9% while 2 times SKHY's move would have been −26.6%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.

SKHN · 1 month to Oct 21, 202610.7 pts ahead of its stated multiple
10.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleSKHN returned +59.1% while −2 times SKHY's move would have been +48.4%. Figures from Sep 21, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.SKHY −24.2% ×−2 implies+48.4%SKHN returned+59.1%10.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleSKHN returned +59.1% while −2 times SKHY's move would have been +48.4%. Figures from Sep 21, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.SKHY −24.2% ×−2 implies+48.4%SKHN returned+59.1%

SKHN returned +59.1% while −2 times SKHY's move would have been +48.4%. Figures from Sep 21, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.

SKHN returned +59.1% while −2 times SKHY's move would have been +48.4%. Figures from Sep 21, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

Performance, window by window: SK vs SKHN: Leverage, Returns & Decay
Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSKSKHNSKSKHNSKSKHN
1 month−44.8%+59.1%−48.4%+48.4%+3.6 pts+10.7 pts
3 months−37.9%–−26.6%–−11.3 pts–
Since launch
Not the same days: SK Jul 2026 · SKHN Jul 2026
−57.3%−45.5%−52.2%−20.2%−5.1 pts−25.3 pts

Source: ETFIQ. – means no data for this window, usually because the fund is younger than it. Open this comparison in the app →

On the same fields

SK
Corgi SK hynix 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of SK hynix (SKHY)
SKHN
Tradr 2X Short SK Hynix Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of SK hynix (SKHY)
Issuer Corgi Tradr
Sets out to return +2x −2x
Underlying asset SKHY SKHY
Segment company index
Fund returned, 3 months −37.9% −45.5% (since launch, Jul 28, 2026)
Underlying returned, over that window −13.3% +10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −26.6% −20.2%
Difference from stated, over that window −11.3 pts −25.3 pts
Fund returned, 1 year −57.3% (since launch, Jul 14, 2026) −45.5% (since launch, Jul 28, 2026)
Difference from stated, over that window −5.1 pts (since launch, Jul 14, 2026) −25.3 pts (since launch, Jul 28, 2026)
Underlying volatility 78% 74%
Difference over the days both have traded +3.6 pts +10.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.50% 1.49%
First traded Jul 14, 2026 Jul 28, 2026
Net assets $18m $728,651

As of Oct 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About SK

Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SKHY's −13.3% implies −26.6%, which makes SK look 11.3 points short. That is not the fund's objective, which is daily. Of that 11.3, daily compounding is −8.7 points, which any 2 times fund would show over the same path, and the fund itself is −2.6 points against 2 times each day's move, compounded. SK aims to return +2 times SKHY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. SKHY moved at 78% annualized over that window. The more it moves, the further the two figures separate.

Over the three months to Oct 21, 2026, SK lost 37.9%, against −35.3% for twice SKHY's daily moves.

About SKHN

Over the month to Oct 21, 2026, SKHN returned 59.1%, against 59.1% for twice the inverse of SKHY's daily moves. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SKHY's −24.2% implies +48.4%, which makes SKHN look 10.7 points over. SKHN aims to return -2 times SKHY's move each day, then resets. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. SKHY moved at 55% annualized over that window.

Of that 10.7, daily compounding is +10.8 points, which any −2 times fund would show over the same path, and the fund itself is −0.1 points against −2 times each day's move, compounded.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its daily multiple, SK or SKHN?
Over the window to Oct 21, 2026, SK finished 11.3 points from what its multiple implies and SKHN finished 10.7 points from its own, so SKHN came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SK and SKHN levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on SK hynix, SK at +2 times and SKHN at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SK or SKHN?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SK’s moved at 78% annualized and SKHN’s at 55%, so SK has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SK or SKHN for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day, and daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move; after a fall and recovery it is lower.
Which is cheaper, SK or SKHN?
SK charges 0.50% a year and SKHN charges 1.49%, so SK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SK against SKHN, data as of Oct 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/sk-vs-skhn

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.