VFMF vs WTV: how they differ
VFMF and WTV hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and VFMF returned +29.9% over the year. Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund.
WTV costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points; WTV is 2.7 times larger.
| VFMF | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.12% |
| Net assets, VFMF as of Sep 30, 2026 and WTV as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.1bn | $2.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +29.9% | +18.2% |
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 8.9% | 21.5% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, VFMF and WTV hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
19% in common
On the same fields
VFMF and WTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VFMF in plain words
VFMF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +29.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 47% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 613 positions, with the top ten at 8.9%.
WTV in plain words
WTV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 82% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 123 positions, with the top ten at 21.5%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, VFMF or WTV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VFMF returned +29.9% and WTV +18.2%.
- Which is cheaper, VFMF or WTV?
- WTV is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $6. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, VFMF against WTV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vfmf-vs-wtv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). VFMF against WTV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vfmf-vs-wtv
[VFMF against WTV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vfmf-vs-wtv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.