SMIG vs WTV: how they differ
SMIG and WTV hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and WTV returned +18.2% over the year. Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund.
WTV costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; WTV is 2.0 times larger.
| SMIG | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.12% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.5bn | $2.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.7% | +18.2% |
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.3% | 21.5% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 4.2%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SMIG and WTV hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
3% in common
On the same fields
SMIG and WTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SMIG in plain words
SMIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 35% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 42.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
WTV in plain words
WTV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 82% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 123 positions, with the top ten at 21.5%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SMIG or WTV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SMIG returned +9.7% and WTV +18.2%.
- Which is cheaper, SMIG or WTV?
- WTV is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $48. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, SMIG against WTV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/smig-vs-wtv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). SMIG against WTV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/smig-vs-wtv
[SMIG against WTV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/smig-vs-wtv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.